| Vol.1/2009 |
Is it possible or not? Situation awareness in using secondary tasks while driving Situational Awareness and anticipatory processes Do the elderly drive with more situation awareness than the younger? Cognitive Parameter for the Relationship of Situation Awareness and Behaviour
Situation Awareness applied to Aeronautics and Automotive:
|
| Vol.2/2009 |
Social Determinants of Programme Developments of Labour Policy in Germany Relevance of the concept “betriebliche Lebenswelt” Ergonomics in the Debate on Humanisation – A Review Evaluation of the DGB-Index ‘Good Work’ from an ergonomic point of view
|
| Vol.3/2009 |
Integrating User Experience and Usability Engineering: Elements, Principles, and Procedures Ergotyping in the computer-aided development and design process Situation awareness and automation at naval work-places Effect of high-precision demands on muscular strain during handarm- trunk movements
|
| Vol.4/2009 | Health Literacy and Prevention Culture. Indicators of Health and Success within Organisations: a model of action |
|
Is it possible or not? Situation awareness in using secondary tasks while driving Author: Nadja Rauch, Barbara Gradenegger und Hans-Peter Krüger Keywords: Situation awareness, method, secondary task, anticipation, driving simulation
Summary Situational Awareness and anticipatory processes Author: Wolfgang Kallus Keywords: Situational awareness, aviation accidents, spatial disorientation, psychophysiological strain measurement, simulator study, anticipatory behaviour control
Summary
Practical Relevance Do the elderly drive with more situation awareness than the younger? Author: Mark Vollrath, Jannette Maciej, Jürgen Howe,Susanne Briest Keywords: elderly drivers, intersection, driving behavior, accident risk, situation awareness
Summary
Practical Relevance Author: Martin R. K. Baumann, Diana Rösler, Josef F. KremsKeywords: Visual demand, distraction, cognitive demand, situation model, in-car tasks, driving
Summary
Practical relevance Cognitive Parameter for the Relationship of Situation Awareness and Behaviour
Author:
Oliver Sträter
Practical relevance Author: Nicola Fricke, Manfred Thüring Keywords: Semantic Enrichment, Situation Awareness, Driving Simulator, Collision Warning Summary
Situation awareness is important for maintaining a constantly safe
driving behavior. Especially in critical driving situations, such as
potential collisions, it is sometimes not possible to achieve an
adequate level of situation awareness. As a consequence, it might not
always be possible to avoid negative outcomes because aspects of the
situation or the driver or both might lead to impeded conditions. To
help drivers focus on relevant aspects in the driving environment, it
could be helpful to assist them by presenting a collision warning
signal. An effective warning should inform the driver about the critical
situation. Relevant aspects in such a situation are information about
the nature of the danger and its spatial position. Therefore, the
collision warning signal should be enriched with this semantic content.
The aim of such an approach is to enhance the situation awareness of a
driver so that he can make an adequate and fast reaction.
Practical relevance Situation Awareness applied to Aeronautics and Automotive: Studies and Guidelines Author: Jerome Barbe, Lucas Stephane Keywords: Situation Awareness, Subjective Assessment Methods, SAGAT, CC-SART, Cross Domain Studies, Aeronautics and Automotive Domains
Summary Practical relevance This paper aims to show how to use Situation Awareness methods in the early design as well as in the evaluation process of onboard systems. Subjective assessment methods such as SAGAT and CC-SART were used in a cross domain studies. Commonalities and differences in the use of SA methods are showed in automotive and aeronautics related to the specificities of each domain. |
|
|
Social Determinants of Programme Developments of Labour Policy in Germany Author: Günter Neubauer und Paul Oehlke Keywords: Work research and labour policy, humanisation of work and quality of work, socially oriented research and technology policy, institutionalized forms of participation and constellation of social forces, democratic welfare state and regulated markets Summary Our presentation lays the focus on the relationship between macro-level determinants and micro-level developments of labour policy programmes since the late 1960ies. Protagonists of labour policies succeeded in transforming the recessionborn trends of social upheaval into a broad reform agenda under the label of venturing more democracy. It implied quite a variety of legal improvements in labour policies, in particular, in the areas of occupational safety and health and of industrial relations. Works councils’ rights of codetermination in social, personnel and economic questions laid down in the amended Works Constitution Act from 1972 included explicitly the application of scientific knowledge in the design of work and technology according to human needs. These demands were taken up by the Federal Government through funding the action and research programme “humanisation of work” (1974-1989) which distinguished by producing scientific findings alike for improving working conditions and modernizing the national economy. According to such bipartisan objectives there were institutionalized diverse interaction channels between the social partners from project to programme level. In a relative short time, they began to function as dialogue arenas with learning effects top-down and bottom-up thus contributing to rationalize basic conflicts and to promote the building up of an integral labour-oriented power constellation which did realize elements of productivity progress according to human needs. By and large, the alternative design solutions in various fields of personnel and organizational, work and technology development were focused by the competent bipartite advisory panel of the government into a comprehensive understanding of innovation giving a programmatic input for linkages of technical and economic dimensions with social and human demands. But, herewith supported, the shift of the Fordist techno-economic paradigm towards integrated work tasks and autonomous team work implied an increasing influence of works councils and unions on programme level which was questioned by the employers and their federations. Their resistance resulted finally in a restriction of the rather big transfer projects of the social partners informing and qualifying their respective target groups. The further termination of branch activities and their discourse platforms, getting a striking expression in the melting down of the programme budget in the 1990ies indicated a creeping erosion of the workoriented actor configuration during the superseding “Work and Technology” programme (1989 to 2000). The formerly wide-spread opportunities of participation functioning as the institutional backbone of programme development have been dried out in the course of the neoliberal transformation of the welfare state to primarily competitive functions. In this transition period, the comprehensive understanding of innovation narrowed down to more or less entrepreneurial objectives in both of the following programmes from 2000 onwards though centered still on the general objectives of “innovative workplace design” and “competence development”. In view of the up- and downgrading spirals of labour policies work researchers are demanded to get a deeper understanding of their social and economic determinants. Thus, regressive orientations on national and company levels have been released by liberalized financial markets stimulating an intensified global competition which forced companies to short-termed, often quarterly profit calculations. The mounting pressure on reducing costs though detrimental to quality production was supported by the deregulation of labour markets and the spreading of precarious forms of employment giving rise to strained and worsening working conditions as well as stagnant or even shrinking wages. Moreover, private and public practices of limiting and saving labour, social and tax expenses combined with insufficient consumer demand, public investments and corporate innovations altogether in favour of uprising private profits, shareholder value expectations and monetary liquidity pushed finance-driven accumulation and speculation strategies triggering off a still ongoing and deepening financial and economic crisis. It puts on the agenda again a renewed political embedding of unfettered market forces through social regulations and public interventions. They might offer nowadays again chances for a renaissance of humanisation policies which could pave the way for better work, quality production and a high development path in a sustainable perspective. Practical relevance The analysis of social determinants of the development of labour policy programmes gives points of reference for a deeper understanding on the practical relevance of funding activities for industrial science. There might be gained, moreover, a better evaluation of the respective selection criteria of research subjects, of the appropriate methodologies and particularly of the opportunities for a broader application of research results. In this context, particularly the new generation of academics is demanded to develop a reflexive relationship concerning the context-dependence of their own contributions to definitely improving working and living conditions. Relevance of the concept “betriebliche Lebenswelt” Author: Eva Senghaas-Knobloch Keywords: Subjective coping strategies, subjectivation of work, organizational mindfulness Summary The concept of „betriebliche Lebenswelt“ was developed in the context of basic research for the “Aktions- und Forschungsprogramm Humanisierung des Arbeitslebens” (‘Action and Research Programme on Humanization of Worklife’) which aimed at transcending tayloristic working conditions. The empirical research took place between 1979 and 1981 and explored subjective strategies which workers and employees develop to cope with demands to fulfil their given tasks. The findings demonstrated that group specific, partly unconscious, subjective strategies in the context of different organizational departments and different hierarchical levels merged towards an organizational configuration that blocks humanization of work conditions. But it was not until the late 1990ies, when tayloristic management approaches in mass production were problematized and an interest in the subjective dimension of work gained momentum in theory and practice. In recent work- and industrial sociological research the new management strategies were conceptualized as “subjectivation” of work. This article discusses the strengths and weaknesses of this concept with respect to an understanding of the new management trends and of the subjective responses on the side of the workers and employees: The concept of “subjectivation” rightly emphasizes the new organizational perception of subjectivity not any more as disturbing but as a important achievement potential at work, and it correctly analyzes the new management strategies aiming at self commitment and self control of workers, replacing direct orders. But, “subjectivation of work” in this sense is not new to non-industrial vocations and professions since the intrinsic quality at least of the person related services demands selfcommitment and self control. Also, the concept of “subjectivation” rightly addresses the new attempts to use subjectivity as an economic potential for rationalization. But it underestimates the relevance of subjective coping strategies which contribute to the fact that workers under new as under old conditions often rise open critique against overburdening demands only after having experienced severe health problems. New data on the increase of psychic health problems give evidence that it is fruitful to use a psychoanalytical understanding of subjectivity that encompasses the relevance of the unconsciousness also in new work contexts. It is argued that the concept of “betriebliche Lebenswelt” is founded on such an understanding of subjectivity which helps explaining why workers and employees under the new conditions of internal quasi-marketization of organizations and of demands on self-management and self-control hardly express openly their problems with commissioned tasks but lacking resources to fulfil them. What is needed, therefore, are special organizational spaces for their articulation. Practical Relevance Supporting anticipative processes in the control of dynamic systems by training and technical support systems might be an important contribution to enhance safety and to reduce human error. Ergonomics in the Debate on Humanisation – A Review Author: Friedrich Fürstenberg Keywords: Job research, labour politics, labour economics, ergonomics interdisciplinary, ergonomic research, humanisation of work as an active process Summary In the 1970s and 1980s German-speaking ergonomists reached a consensus that ergonomics is a science relating to human work, which must use an interdisciplinary approach and integrate and apply the knowledge gained in the individual disciplines. This consensus and the debate on labour and social policies which took place during this period resulted in a wide variety of approaches to the question of scientifically correct and humane job design which finally crystallised into an Action Programme for Humanisation of Working Life (HdA) . This objective of subject-oriented job quality has persisted up to the present day. The International Labour Organisation (ILO) has, for example, defined global promotion of decent work as its principal objective. In Germany, the German Ministry of Labour’s initiative New Quality of Work (INQA) and trade union demands for ‘good work’ are examples of the efforts to promote subject-oriented job quality. The basic consensus described above was documented in several widely-circulated memoranda from the Gesellschaft für Arbeitswissenschaft (GfA). The experience gained with the available instruments for ongoing advancement of ergonomics (research, teaching, further training, institutionalisation in education and business) and its application in the form of research programmes (HdA-, AuT-, …) etc., was evaluated to enable conclusions to be drawn on ways to promote further development of ergonomics and job/workplace research, in which humanisation of work is regarded as a process involving action and negotiation and the actors approach issues relating to job design, introduction of new ideas and conservation of old ones in accordance with their personal interests. Promotion under the HdA programme transgressed the normal confines of technology promotion in an innovative way, in that ‘participation-oriented execution’ involving various advisory committees was not only the hallmark of, but also the motive force behind the programme. The ‘HdA Community’(consisting of representatives from the employers’ associations, the DGB and individual German unions, ergonomists, scientists from other disciplines, the bureaucracy and institutions responsible for projects) met at these committees and also at workshops, congresses, product presentations etc. and conducted a critical, but constructive dialogue. Despite all the contentious and opposing positions defended during this dialogue, this was one of the biggest advances made by the HdA programme (AuT programme). Supported by research under the HdA programme, correct job and workplace design evolved to a certain extent into a socio-cultural development project. But the limited nature of the political objectives and of the execution and results of the HdA projects (AuT-P.) become evident in retrospect: • concentration on industrial work processes (work systems), • predominance of technical or technological solutions based on available expert knowledge, • failure to activate the workers themselves and to involve them systematically (despite the participation-oriented basis on which the programme was planned), • failure to make due allowance for gender issues, • failure to make due allowance for as yet unrecognised, but growing challenges presented by an aging workforce and the need to design jobs for increasingly older workers, • the relationship between work and private life and its consequences for a worker’s lifestyle (this HdA been noted during the programme’s early phases but not adequatelyinvestigated), • the lack of investigation into relationships extending beyond the confines of individual work units, including systematic international comparisons. In spite of these shortcomings, the period during which the HdA and AuT projects were running was one in which ergonomics made great strides forward and succeeded in applying acquired knowledge to the design of scientifically more acceptable work systems and processes. This is still valid comment despite the fact that expectations HdA been exaggerated and that performance HdA been sub-optimal in some cases, which some observers attribute to excessive emphasis on political aspects. Because labour politics, if practised in the open, critical, but constructive way that prevailed within the HdA community of the 1970s and 1980s, will remain a fruitful source for improvement in the quality of labour relations. Practical Relevance The contribution is seen as a summary of significant statements from publications on encouragement of application of ergonomic knowledge on correct job and workplace design that has been through interdisciplinary studies. It outlines possible approaches to questions of evaluation and defines humanised work as a socio-cultural development project. It is also a plea for continuation of the programmes for advancement of job and work research at both national and trans-national level. Evaluation of the DGB-Index ‘Good Work’ from an ergonomic point of view Author: Jochen Prümper und Gottfried RichenhagenKeywords: DGB-Index ‘Good Work’, stress/strain, resources, income and security, quality criteria Summary For several years attempts have been made, in several countries, to determine via an index, the quality of jobs regarding working conditions and income. Examples can be found in Flanders/ Belgium (Bourdeaud’hui et al. 2005; Van Ruysseveldt et al. 2002), Canada (Brisbois 2003; Lowe 2007), Austria (Hofinger & Michenthaler 1998), South-Korea (Phang et al. 2007) and the U.S. (Howell & Diallo 2007; Lower-Basch 2007). A further concept aims at calculating the quality of work at regular intervals across European state borders. The European Trade Union Institute for Research, Education and Health and Safety (ETUI-REHS), for example, recently presented the ”Job Quality Index” (JQI), “an indicator that enables comparison both over time and between European countries, using a broad but focused conceptualisation of job quality that can be updated at regular intervals“ (Leschke & Watt 2008, p. 7). The DGB-Index ‘Good Work’ is part of the endeavours to develop a national index. It has been developed with the aim to allow “a scientifically based report about the quality of work in Germany” (Sommer 2007, p. 4) and to provide on a scale from 0 to 100 “a figure for the quality of working conditions and income from an employees point of view” (Lauschke 2007, S. 9). Index values between 80 and 100 define “Good Work”, values between 50 and 80 “Moderate Work”, an index value lower than 50 means “Poor Work”. The questionnaire underlying the index consists of 31 questions (see Fuchs 2008, p. 18 and 25ff.). Each of the 31 questions allows for 10 to 13 possible answers, depending on the kind of question. Those questions are condensed to 15 dimensions which themselves are divided into three general indices: stress/strains, resources, income and security (Stuth 2008, p. 7). The questions deal with the following topics: Resources: 1. Possibilities of qualification and development, 2. Room for creativity, 3. Career opportunities, 4. Possibilities to gain and exert influence, 5. Information flow, 6. Quality of the management, 7. Company culture, 8. Collegiality, 9. Sense of the work, 10. Organisation of the working time. Stress/strains: 11. Intensity of labour, 12. Emotional requirements, 13. Physical requirements. Income and security: 14. Professional perspectives / Job security, 15. Income Each dimension consists of up to 3 questions. In order to calculate the index, a value between 0 and 100 points is attributed to each answer. In this way, the same value can be obtained by a different combination of answers. The partial values of each of the 15 dimensions are generated from the average of the answers to the respective questions (Fuchs 2008, p. 19ff). The values of the answers from each dimension are then weighted by means of different coefficients (see Fuchs 2008, p. 19ff.) and summarized in general indices. The DGB-Index ‘Good Work’ was released for the first time in the year 2007 (Lauschke, 2007) and is to be provided annually. According to the “DGB-Index Gute Arbeit 2008 – Der Report“ [engl.: “DGB-Index Good Work 2008 – The Report“] (Stuth 2008) 13% of the employees work in Germany is categorized “Good Work“, 55% “Moderate Work“ and 32% “Poor Work“ (Stuth 2008, p. 12). In addition to the index, an online module has been published in the internet, allowing every employee to calculate of his or her jobs index value using the same methodology (see http://www.dgbindex-gute-arbeit.de ). The DGB-Index ‘Good Work’ claims to provide a well grounded and scientifically based report about the quality of work in Germany. This article critically examines the index from an ergonomic point of view and comes to the conclusion that its application cannot be recommended for the following reasons: 1. Scientific quality criteria: The DGB-Index claims to be an ergonomic measure to define the work quality in Germany. So far it has not been argued whether the index matches the quality criteria (especially objectivity, reliability, validity) scientifically defined for such measures. This must, in fact, be considerably doubted. 2. Evaluation method: Constructional faults based on methodological errors in the generation and calculation of the items raw score causes a heavily distorted and inappropriate method of valuation. 3. Company appliance: The index's application in a company context without modification must be criticized because the underlying questionnaire retrieves facts that are partly or entirely outside of the sphere of influence of the single company. In addition, essential strain situations are neglected. 4. Mapping the index scores to categories of ‘Good Work’: The DGB-Index divides jobs into three categories: “Good Work“, “Moderate Work“, “Poor Work“. The criteria for “good“ work and its calculation methods have a priori been set in a way that allows only very few jobs to be rated ‘Good Work’. Regular and representative reports on the quality of work in Germany must be thoroughly appreciated. The authors consider employee surveys a suitable method. But this goal can only be attained if such a coverage is scientifically based and takes place transparently in public. In this regard the article on the DGB-Index ‘Good Work’ reveals important faults. Practical relevance The DGB-Index ‘Good Work’ is supposed to be representatively applied in Germany and within chosen companies in order to deduce measures for a better labor situation on the basis of appropriate employee surveys. Therefore, its ergonomic base is of high practical relevance. |
|
|
Integrating User Experience and Usability Engineering: Elements, Principles, and Procedures Author: Hannes Gotthartsleitner, Peter Eberle and Christian Stary Keywords: Usability Engineering Life Cycle, SW-development cycle, User Experience, hedonist quality, Usability, User Interface, epistemological analysis Summary This paper deals with two approaches to human-oriented design of interactive systems: Usability Engineering (UE) and User Experience (UX). UE can be considered a well established field since the advent of User-Centered Design, while UX has been recently touted to supplement traditional user-interface development with human-related factors, such as fun. In the contribution not only the underlying conceptual frameworks are revisited for both approaches, but also the procedures to be followed in the course of development. UE is a traditional engineering discipline. As such, its emphasis is on handling principles for design that should lead to user interfaces meeting requirements, as they concern user-related objectives in terms of interaction facilities and work tasks. Usability Engineering design elements and lifecycles have been proposed, in order to structure the development process starting with collecting requirements, following design guidelines, and mapping specifications to accurate code in the course of implementation. Experiences when using a structured procedure for development have been consolidated in standards and normative frameworks, driven by international bodies at international levels (EU, ISO). Software-ergonomic principles, such as robustness, have been embodied for design and evaluation of interactive artefacts. UX is a set of hedonic qualities that can be assigned to interactive artefacts. It can also be measured in terms of user satisfaction, attractivity of an artefact, or fun when using an artefact. However, so far no consensus on a definition or a theoretical model on UX has been achieved. In an attempt to put the different approaches into mutual context the relationships between users, artefacts and the organization in which artefacts are utilized, have been considered and could link UX to UE aspects, such as ergonomic principles. UX manifests itself along the user-artefact relationship and the organisation-artefact relationship. At the user-product relationship the functions provided as well as the hedonic qualities are perceived at a pragmatic layer. At the organisation-product relationship no conceptions of users are addressed in a direct way, rather business processes and business communication. From the perspective of perception qualities can be decomposed into a perceived pragmatic quality and a perceived hedonic quality. The perceived pragmatic quality mainly corresponds to usability since it targets perceived utility and functional use. The perceived hedonic quality is not goal-oriented, in contrast to the functionality-driven aspects. However, it concerns certain quality aspects, such as innovativeness, originality, or exclusivity. The hedonic quality addresses human eager towards curiosity and proudness in social relationships whereas the pragmatic quality addresses the need towards security, control and trust. According to UX frameworks developers try to combine hedonic and pragmatic quality in the artefact, e.g. having structured layouts or innovative colours. The user perceives the qualities of the product and judges according to his or her perception. As such subjective factors play a role, whereas developers achieve objective qualities. Nevertheless, the perception might correspond to the intention of developers. When evaluating the design of interactive artefacts, the pragmatic and hedonistic quality is perceived in a mutually independent way, although both contribute to the perceived attractiveness of an artefact. As such, they need to be considered in a mutually tuned way for design, but might be differentiated for evaluation. From a methodological perspective, UX can not only be implemented along the traditional engineering phases, but also using the same methods. However, UX requires adjustments that reflect hedonic qualities, both, for designing artefacts, and evaluating them. A coherent development procedure would require references of traditional development principles, such as task conformance, to hedonic qualities in a context-sensitive way, such attractiveness of interactive task accomplishment. These relations will be the topic of further research when aligning UX to UE, and vice versa. Practical Relevance In this article we review existing concepts of Usability Engineering and UX. For practical use guidelines to integrate UX and Usability Engineering techniques in the course of user-interface development are examined. Ergotyping in the computer-aided development and design process Author: Christiane Kamusella and Martin Schmauder Keywords: Ergonomic tools, Human model, Product development process, Digital prototyping, Machine safety Summary The computer-aided development and design process of technical products and systems is carried out using digital prototypes. For ergonomics-related problems, ergonomics tools in the form of digital man models are applied. The methods and tools that are oriented to particular ergonomic aspects can be subsumed under the new term „ergotyping,“ a neologism that comes from “ergonomics” and “prototyping.” Ergotyping is applied when ergonomic aspects are analyzed with the above-mentioned tools and methods: when planning man-machine systems. The goal of ergotyping is the quickest possible, optimal synthesis of functionality and interaction with people according to the requirements of ergonomics. This article conveys a general overview of the integration of ergotyping. Prospective goals for the further development of digital ergonomics tools is discussed and explained, though limited to the mechanical sector and using the example of product ergonomics. When one considers the main phases in the product-development process, the DIN EN 614-1:2006 mentions general ergonomic tasks for the definition, conception, realization, and application phases. These tasks provide a framework for the integration of ergonomic principles. Phases particularly of interest are those in which digital prototyping, and with it, ergotyping, can be applied. From ergonomic tasks, necessary tools for ergotyping components and the structure of the design process are derived. Should the preparation of ergonomic analysis criteria in ergotyping orient itself more toward the rules and regulations during the individual phases of the development process, the product manufacturer can be supported in his compliance with legal requirements. In the field of machines, the individual interpretation of ergonomically relevant standards to create ergonomic components, and the implementation of ergonomic aspects can be carried out in a step-model. In Step 1, ergonomically relevant contents of harmonized type A and B standards can be prepared as ergotyping components that represent minimum requirements that must be met. For this, one can draw on Section 1 of the Table of Standards in the German Machine Ordinance. The standards that are to be considered product-comprehensive, that is, those that do not limit themselves to one individual machine, can be considered the foundation of every development. In Step 1, contents of type C standards are not taken into account, since these detailed requirements pertain to specific types of machines and are limited to a particular application. In addition to the standards and their contents included in Step 1, ergonomic requirements from further governmental rules and regulations, the regulations of the accident insurers, and the state of the art can be implemented in Step 2. Through this, the so-developed ergotyping components undergo extension beyond the minimum requirements. In order to support the design engineer with the systematic and comprehensive implementation of ergonomic requirements in relation to the man-machine interface, a systematic provision of interpreted contents in ergotyping components within the above-mentioned steps is sensible. For this reason, ergonomic contents of standards allow themselves to be grouped according to user-oriented and product-oriented features with the corresponding subaspects. User-oriented features are, for example, physical requirements such as body measurements, posture, body strength, and movement, among others. Among the product-oriented features are, for example, what is required of machine elements for the reception of information, such as displays and signals, requirements of information input and actuating elements like operating components, etc. Ergonomic requirements come in the form of guidelines, procedures, and statements of characteristics, the last of which provide, on the one hand, indications both for product-oriented conceptual parameters for the object to be designed and for preset evaluation criteria. On the other hand, there are user-oriented parameter features that the man model must represent. Ergonomic guidelines define design goals that should be reached through the corresponding simulation algorithms in the man model and the connected analytic tools. Procedures establish the methods of use for ergonomic tools. Should we succeed in adding ergonomics tool that comprehensibly implement state-of-the-art ergonomic standards to the present functional range of digital man models, such component would provide a further incentive to practitioners to use them in planning and development tasks. There is greater benefit to the user because parameters, data, and their reference to the source of the standards are traced. Particular potential may arise in the future from the systematic integration of harmonized standards, since they are relevant for product manufacturers in generating their product conformity certificates. Emerging solutions can be categorized as ergotyping. Practical relevance Digital man models possess as ergonomics tools various features for research and development tasks, and they help to fulfill different ergonomic requirements. This article directs attention to the security and health requirements, including ergonomics, that product manufacturers must adhere to. For these requirements, considerable effort is still required in order to add further useful modules to ergonomics tools. This article should provide a framework for that endeavor. Author: Michael Knoll, Peter Protzel and Peter Sedlmeier Keywords: search and rescue robots, human-robot-interaction, semi-autonomous, user requirements Summary This
paper is based on an evaluation that investigated the possibilities of
applying robotics technology in search and rescue missions. Due to
technical progress, the possiblities for the use of semi autonomous
robots in this field are rising. Research on semi autonomous robots
usually focusses on the technical optimization of the robots. The user’s
perspective – if analyzed in terms of scientific methodology at all – is
considered with regard to handling and controlling mechanisms at best.
This limited view disregards the fact that the use of robots in rescue
missions does not represent a typical human-computer or human-machine
interaction (cf. Fong et al. 2001; Scholtz 2003). The aim of search and
rescue robot development is the construction of robots that can be
integrated in dynamic interactions characterized by a high degree of
mutual dependencies and a very low error tolerance (cf. Dietrich &
Childress 2004; Pawlowsky et al. 2005; Weick et al. 1999). The robots’
deployment in such highly sensitive functional interplays and the
interaction between humans and robots within this context can only be
successful if all interaction partners are able to contribute their
potentials
Practical RelevanceBy exploring preferences and notions of potential users, this survey contributes to the development of semi-autonomous search and rescue robots and helps to prevent resource intense wrong turns that could be the result of an exclusively technology-oriented approach. It considers the robots’ involvement in interaction and communication processes – a topic that has been neglected so far – and widens the discussion by exceeding ergonomical aspects and building a bridge to the social sciences. Situation awareness and automation at naval work-places Author: Heiko Tietze and Heino WiddelKeywords: situation awareness, automation, assistance system Summary Due to the multiplicity of new and improved sensors, naval air traffic control requires technological support for fast and confident tracking. Future military command and control systems are intended to relieve the operator by innovative human-machine-interfaces and by assistance systems. Regarding resource theories, SA should increase with assistance. The more spare time the operator has the better he can engage in the task and tracks can be identified faster and with enhanced reliability. On the other hand, automation is known to have an impact on vigilance, complacency, overtrust, training and reliability of performance. Therefore, it is questionable whether assistance has a positive or negative bearing on operator’s SA. An innovative graphical human-machine interface (HMI) was used in the study. The HMI prototype consists of a Tactical Situation Display that provides essential information necessary for situation evaluation and handling (figure 1). A Track Detail Display is shown on a secondary screen, where the operator finds parameters that are necessary for a verbal assignment. Computer assistance is implemented as rule based decision support for classification and identification of objects. Figure 2 shows the graphical display of the assistance system. During the experiment, SA was assessed by the Situation Awareness Global Assessment Technique (SAGAT). With this method, simulation is frozen at certain times, the system displays are blanked while the operator has to answer questions in multiple-choice mode concerning the scenario. The study was conducted as 2x2 design with the factors complexity (low vs. high) and decision support (with and without). Complexity was synthesized mainly by the number of tracks but as well by the kind of threat. The experimental trial was preceded by a sufficient practice run with the simulation system and the SAGAT procedure of about one hour. In the experimental trial, each of the four runs, randomly assigned to two low and two high complexity scenarios, lasted about 20 minutes. Runs were interrupted five times to present the SAGAT probes of three or four questions. Sixteen experienced subjects attended the study. Results were evaluated with respect to both factors as means of the correct answers. To contrast SA with performance, users’ behavior was measured and compared to the identity of the track (ID) that would be given by the computer decision support system. Since the ID has different relevance it was taken into account and the third factor ID (red forces = hostile or suspect, blue forces = friendly or assume friendly and neutral) was included in the analysis of variance (ANOVA) of performance. The ANOVA of SAGAT questions reveals a significant main effect of assistance (F(1,5)=9.67; p<.01; η²=0.39). With decision support, the number of correct answers is reduced by about 10%. Both, the factor complexity as well as the interaction are not significant. However, scenarios with higher complexity tend to decrease SA furthermore. Figure 3 shows the interaction. The 2x2x3 ANOVA of behavioral data points to an effect of the factors kind of track (F(2,30)=19.59; p<.001; η²=0.57) and complexity (F(1,15)=6.89; p<.05; η²=0.31). Tracks that should be identified as red forces have 50.6% accordance to the computer calculated ID, blue forces 24%, and neutral tracks 37.9%. During runs with low complexity, tracks were identified correctly with 41.3%, in high-complexity-scenarios with 33.7%. The concordance is raised by about 4.5% with decision support (not significant). Figure 4 shows the interaction. The results support the hypothesis that assistance may have a negative impact on SA. With decision support, SA was diminished by about 10%. Higher complexity of scenario tends to reduce SA furthermore. In contrast to SA, an assistance system is supposed to reduce workload and should result in better performance. Hence, a slight improvement of performance was observed in this study, too. Both, the diminished SA and the increased performance should be taken into account for explanation. Usually, the operator has to observe single tracks, has to acknowledge changes in track behavior, and should recognize track specific data, whereas no decision support is available in conventional systems. With assistance, the task changes to monitoring the assistance system. It is not necessary to have all data present but to know how and why the computer acts. The principal task is solved satisfactorily or even improved, supposing a perfect system. However, the operator pays attention rather to the assistance system than to the scenario or single tracks. As a consequence, he may have a proper SA of the assistance system but not of a track itself. Exaggerated verbalized, the measured ‘scenario SA’ persists only due to the questioning and as tracks need to be selected. This phenomenon is also known as out-of-the-loop problem. Additionally, an assistance system has to be monitored for malfunctions, maladjustments and limited abilities. Any technological system is designed with operational limits. Users need to know these limits. Artificial intelligence may reduce restrictions and extend system’s capacities. On the other hand, more rules and fuzzy logic makes it difficult to cope with the assistance system. Finally, all negative aspects should be balanced with the improvements of the supporting device. In most cases, decision will be made in favor of the support. If so, the ergonomic design is demanded to give all necessary information in an appropriate way. Thereby, it has to be considered that the operator’s task is switched to monitoring. Practical Relevance
Situation awareness has
been proven to be an important indicator for ergonomic assessment of
human-machine interfaces and yields additional information along
subjective and performance dimensions. Results of this study indicate a
diminished SA under assistance that should be coped by operational or
technological measures. Effect of high-precision demands on muscular strain during handarm- trunk movements Author: Marianela Diaz Meyer and Kurt Landau Keywords: delicate objects, unstable objects, muscular strain, subjective assessment, motion-analysis Summary
This paper focuses on the
investigation of unstable objects, which are a type of
delicate objects. Due to special object characteristics, handling
delicate objects in the workplace requires extraordinary precision and
care, in order to avoid human injuries or damaging the object. Examples
of delicate objects are unstable objects (e.g. filled with liquid) and
fragile objects, whereby the worker requires predominantly kinesthetic
and visual feedback during its handling. The worker predominantly
requires kinesthetic and tactile feedback during the handling of other
delicate objects, such as sharp edged, slippery and flexible objects.
Unstable objects (e.g., filled with liquid) can be found in many
industrial sectors such as chemical and pharmaceutical laboratories,
food-processing industries, companies in the service area, and
maintenance work. The deficit in investigations related to the effects
of handling unstable objects, i.e. human strain, has motivated the
present study. 30 subjects ( Practical relevance Manipulation of unstable objects (e.g., fi lled with liquid) can be found in many industrial sectors such as chemical, pharmaceutical laboratories, food-processing industries, companies in the service area, and maintenance work. However there is in the context of ergonomics insuffi cient assessment of human performance and stress-related research during the manipulation of unstable objects. Adequate empirical movement data and stress-related date for the developing of digital human models are as well required. |
|
|
Author: Ralf Schweer, Ulf Krummreich Keywords: Health Literacy, Prevention Culture, Employability, Model development, „Gemeinsame Deutsche Arbeitsschutsstrategie” (GDA) Summary Based on the changed requirements of a transformed world of work, in which the measure aimed at a specific person is increasingly playing a more important role alongside workplace enhancement approaches, an integrated model for action is developed for healthy and successful work against the background of the Joint German Occupational Safety and Health Strategy. On the basis of current concepts and research results concerning the processes of accident and work-related illness, an integration of the concepts of health literacy and prevention culture into future prevention strategies is advocated. The incorporation of the concepts into the Joint German Occupational Safety and Health Strategy (GDA) serves as an example. The GDA is the work safety strategy supported jointly by national and regional government and accident insurance companies. This has the objective of maintaining, improving and promoting the safety and health of employees with coordinated and systematic work safety, complemented by measures for the promotion of health in the workplace. Evidence is provided for the increasing importance of the subject of health on the basis of current research findings. From these approaches, the requirement is derived that – in addition to preventive measures for the promotion of health – the personality of the employee and personal responsibility should be taken more into account. The concept of health literacy is not restricted by the authors to the factor of the acquisition of knowledge; instead, current findings and concepts concerning employability are also incorporated in the observations. For example, the model of health literacy that is presented (Kriegesmann et. al., 2005) takes into account theories of motivation and theories of personality with its differentiation between capacity to act, knowledge and ability for action, readiness to act, motives for acting. The concept of prevention culture is advanced based upon the approach to company culture proposed by Schein (1985). According to this, prevention cultures are also implicit in the fact that they are opinions about action that are accepted by everyone. They are the result of collective processes; the basic principle is reflected, more or less, in the behaviour of every individual. Prevention culture also grows historically, which is to say as a result of organisational knowledge and learning. The integrated stage model of health literacy and prevention culture presented here builds a bridge between the workplace enhancement approaches of the last few decades and these new findings. It favours a cooperative inclusion of all parties involved in the subject of health and in addition asks for a sustained approach. Organisations and individuals are called upon to accept the subjects of health and health promotion as a key area of competence for successful and healthy existence in a rapidly changing environment. The employability of the individual and the prevention culture of an organisation thus fuse into an integrated model of health literacy & prevention culture. The individual stages of the model each build upon one another and can be defined, and thus specifically promoted and developed, on the basis of their development criteria or indicators. Three different development stages are postulated that can act as a means of orientation and an opportunity for development for companies. The model pursues several objectives: 1) Implementing health and safety in the core processes of a company. 2) Promoting a lastingly forward-looking attitude towards handling the organisation’s resources. 3) Shaping the company as the foundation of the preventive measures. 4) Improving the health literacy of the individual employee and thus maintaining employability. 5) Strengthening interest in the development of one’s own competences, and positively structuring employability as a life-long learning process and as something that can be directly experienced. The basic assumption of the authors is that encouragement by the company can have a supporting effect but will not fundamentally change the employees’ development of competence. It is much more the case that the health-literate employee himself adapts to the complexity and variability of modern service-providing businesses. He develops a self-concept that defines health and life-long productivity as a positive aim and that connects growth and interest in company developments with commitment. The sustained implementation of the subjects of health literacy and prevention culture requires continuity, commitment and well- structured processes as well as the broad acceptance of all those involved. Practical Relevance The integrated model of organisational prevention culture and health literacy provides distinct key factors, to evaluate the level of prevention culture and health literacy. This knowledge can be used to generate and integrate measures, capable of lifting organisations and individuals to the next level of development. The concept is also integrated in the new political strategy “Gemeinsame Deutsche Arbeitsschutzstrategie”; therefore it influences the future of prevention strategies in Germany. Wuppertaler Gesundheitsindex für Unternehmen (WGU) Author: Mike Hammes, Rainer Wieland, Sandra Winizuk Keywords: Health care index, demands, physical disorders, absenteeism, presenteeism Summary Companies decide to take action in improving internal structures and operations with a variety of goal settings. Characteristic values and indexes are approved to control such actions as they are able to illustrate the developments of changing processes in a clearly manner. There already exist some suggestions in practice and literature to develop an index approach to control actions in workplace health promotion. The “Wuppertaler Gesundheitsindex für Unternehmen (WGU)” was developed to asses a company’s health care potential and to control actions taken place in workplace health promotion. The present article firstly outlines the concept the WGU is based on. Secondly it reports some results about its validation. The WGU is conceptualized as a resource oriented index. It bases on an effect model in order to design work healthy and efficient. The model relates the following five domains of work: (1) working conditions and tasks, (2) leadership behavior, (3) personnel characteristics such as health care competency, (4) psychological demands and well being during work and (5) long-termed effects such as physical disorders and absenteeism. Within the WGU, the domains (1) to (4) are represented by measures with high relevance for the employee’s health: (1) regulation hindrances, (2) employee oriented leadership behavior, (3) health care competency and (4) balance of demands as the difference between functional and dysfunctional demands. The measures (1) to (3) are modify able input variables, ‘balance of demands’ is a non modify able process variable. The four measures are transformed to characteristic values, lying between 0 and 1. A characteristic value of 1 stands for an optimal development of the underlying measure. Value 0 means no occurrence of the underlying measure. The four characteristic values are weighted on the base of two studies. The WGU is the sum of the weighted characteristic values. The WGU is a normal distributed measure. It allows classifying employees and their working conditions, using four levels of a company’s health care potential. Based on the mean value, we differ the following levels of health care potential: high (up to plus one standard deviation), low (up to minus one standard deviation), very high (more than plus one standard deviation) and very low (more than minus one standard deviation). Domain (5) of the effect model is represented by the occurrence of physical disorders, absenteeism and presenteeism. These measures are related to the WGU as output variables. The analyses of two studies show a systematical relation between the levels of the WGU and the occurrence of physical disorders. Also the height of the WGU shows a statistically meaningful relation with absenteeism and presenteeism. The higher the WGU level is, the more seldom are physical disorders. This is most strikingly for unspecific disorders. Here, the four levels are differentiable statistically meaningful for both studies. For cardiovascular disorders, only three levels are differentiable. The levels ‘high’ and ‘very high’ have to be combined to one level. In respect to musculoskeletal disorders, the four levels are differentiable significantly in one study. In the other study, we again have to combine the levels ‘high’ and ‘very high’ to one level. The higher the WGU value is the lower is the extent of absenteeism and presenteeism. This shows an examination of corresponding crosstabs (median bisection), which become significant for both studies. This result is primarily interesting, concerning presenteeism, because it is contradictory to the expectation that bad working conditions will lead to absenteeism. Contrary to this expectation we found that the worse working conditions are, the longer employees go to work despite illness (paradox of presenteeism). This contribution introduces the “Wuppertaler Gesundheitsindex für Unternehmen (WGU)” which allows to reliably appraising the company’s health care potential and also enables to make assured statements about relations between the WGU and output measures, which are relevant for companies and employees (occurrence of physical disorders, absenteeism, and presenteeism). Practical Relevance The “Wuppertaler Gesundheitsindex für Unternehmen” allows appraising a company’s or department’s health care potential and, respectively, enables to make assured statements about relations between the WGU and the occurrence of physical disorders, and the extent of absenteeism, and presenteeism. As an index, it enables to illustrate the actual state of health care potential and its development in a clearly manner, and thus, positions itself within the current controlling practice. Because it is able to differentiate up to four levels of health care potential, concerning occurrence of physical disorders, it allows detecting groups of employees for which actions of health care promotion are most indicated. Author: Yvonne Ferreira, Verena Bopp, Ralph Bruder Keywords: Safety at Work, Stress, lifting and carrying loads, older employees, Gender Mainstreaming Summary There are two ways to improve the employability. The first is on the individual and the second is on the organizational level. It makes sense to simultaneously work on both levels and to use an integrated concept. Thus, it is possible to derive sustainable and effective measures. Above all, measures on the individual level require support from the whole organization because it is very difficult to change personal behaviour. Therefore, it is necessary to create innovative and appealing methods to convince the employees, that improving their own employability is worthwhile and feasible. Nevertheless, an individual can achieve more: they can not only change their own behaviour but also develop a new perspective on their work place. Often, there is only an undefined feeling that something with the work place is wrong. However, what exactly it is and how to change it is unclear. This is where the presented software comes in. Especially in small and medium-sized enterprises, knowledge and possibilities to create working conditions to promote health are missing. It was the aim to create an instrument to fill these gaps in knowledge and to highlight the resources of the employees and the company. The instrument has the following functions: • Health promotion • Improvement of job design • Employee qualification • Ability of individuals to detect and minimize deficits, and through utilization of personal strengths to affect gainful change. The employees have to utilize their own experiences to improve their capacity to act. Hence, the instrument has to focus on simulation, practicing of behavioural patterns and e-learning. Next to the goal of assisting small and medium-sized enterprises, another focal point was to improve the employability of three employee segments, which have a particular relevance. These groups are: • older employees • employees with an health impairment • and women in terms of gender mainstreaming. Furthermore, not only the employees but also the managers and employers need to be considered. Employability has a lot of infl uencing factors, for example skills, competences, abilities and talents, physical fi tness, work equipment, workplace, work climate and so on. To limit the scope of the work, only two relevant ergonomic themes were focused upon. These themes are: • Proper stress prevention • Lifting and carrying loads These themes are, on the one hand, very current and on the other hand, they have many interconnections with other (working) conditions. In order to simulate and practice safety behavioural patterns at work, we chose a multimedia software. Multimedia means, that not only digital mediums are integrated but other technical and application-oriented dimensions are utilized as well. Multimedia concepts allow the use of time-dependant dimensions (for example videos and audio files) and time-independent dimensions (for example words, graphics or pictures). Such software allows the integration of databases, communication systems as well as virtual realities. The software supports multi-tasking, parallel as well as interactive tasks. Above all, the aspect of interactivity is particularly interesting for learning and teaching scenarios. The content can be regulated by the user on demand or based on their abilities (for example speed, language). The developed software uses animations, interactions, videos … and several sensory channels for better and comfortable learning. This leads to an increased retention of the learned and practiced knowledge. Unfortunately, the software is only available in German, but it is free. Please look at www.vbf.arbeitswissenschaft.de. The download requires some time, so please be patient. Practical relevance Motivating instruments to improve the employability are in part cost savings, for example, by decreasing the amount of missed work time. They also assist the employees in improving their physical well-being and their quality of life. Author: Peter Stadler, Erika SpießKeywords: Employability, psycho-social stressors, work-related risk factors, back pain, heath promotion Summary In view of the demographic change in the work force, there is an increasing focus on the question of how the employability of an ageing population can be maintained and promoted. Against this background, the article deals with the number one health problem – back pain – and its work-related psychosocial risk factors. A literature search was conducted for this purpose in various databases in the fields of medicine, psychology and social sciences (MEDLINE, PSYNDEX, PsycINFO), in order to detect risk factors and deduce strategies for promoting employability. The literature research shows that work-related, psycho-social risk factors have a huge stand-alone influence on the genesis and chronification of unspecific back pain. A high work pace, poor job control, monotonous work tasks, gratification crises, lack of feedback, deficient social support from co-workers and superiors, social conflicts at the workplace and a resulting dissatisfaction with the working environment are empirically verified risk factors for back pain. In the past, these factors have not been taken into consideration sufficiently. In order to effectively reduce back pain, it is necessary to adopt a bio-psycho-social concept which takes into account the multicausality of such diseases. It has meanwhile been empirically verified that holistic interventions in an industrial setting pay off – with respect to both health and finances. Studies show that back pain can be reduced by up to 40%, if these psycho-social risk factors at the workplace could be avoided. Therefore prevention efforts should include psychosocial risk factors more than they used to have. Reducing work-related stressors and building up health-promoting resources are important fields of actions in an industrial setting in order to prevent back pain and to maintain and promote employability. A central role is played particularly by work organization measures and strategies to promote the work climate. Work organization measures in this note are, for example, • autonomy and control at work, • variable and interesting workplaces; measures to counter monotony at work can be: job enlargement, job enrichment und partially autonomous teamwork, • preventing enduring time pressure, • social support at work, • transparency concerning the work and the company, • compensation for work situations which are emotionally straining (e.g. working on or receiving extra breaks). Management strategies to promote the work climate are, for example, • giving credit to successful work, • giving regular feedback to the workers, • coaching and mentoring, • all measures which target an improvement of the social climate at work. The success of the organizational efforts to promote back health also depends on how preventive measures can be adapted to the concrete risk factors at the workplace, the active participation of the employees and support by the management and leadership. This can be an important contribution to maintain and promote employability. Practical Relevance The authors show important fields of actions in organizations to reduce work-related stressors and build up health-promoting resources, particularly by work organization measures and strategies to promote the work climate. This will help to prevent back pain and promote employability. |
|